Is it legal to record business calls? US call-recording laws by state
50states in one table, with the statute for each.
Short answer: yes, in the US it's generally legal for a business to record its own phone calls, but the rule depends on the state. Federal law only needs one person on the call to agree, and that person can be you. About a dozen states go further and require everyone on the call to agree. The simple fix that works in every state: tell callers at the start that the call may be recorded.
This is general information, not legal advice. Laws change and the details depend on your situation, so talk to a lawyer in your state before relying on it. Checked October 29, 2026.
The federal rule: one-party consent
The federal Wiretap Act makes it legal to record a call if you're a party to it, or if one party agrees, as long as you're not recording to commit a crime or a tort (18 U.S.C. § 2511(2)(d)). That's called one-party consent. If your business answers a call and records it, your business is the one party, so under federal law alone you don't need the caller's permission.
Federal law is only the floor. States can be stricter, and several are.
All-party (two-party) consent states
In an all-party consent state, often called a two-party consent state, everyone on the call must agree before you record. Sources count these states a little differently because some laws are mixed. The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and a 50-state chart from law firm Kilpatrick Townsend differ slightly, but both list:
California, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Montana, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania and Washington. Nevada also requires everyone's consent for phone calls, and Connecticut, Delaware, Michigan and Oregon are mixed cases that the table below explains.
If you're in one of these states, or you call people who are, assume you need everyone's consent.
What about calls between two states?
This is where it gets messy. If your shop is in Texas (one-party) and your customer is in California (all-party), which law applies? Courts don't all agree. Some look at where the recording is made, others at where the person being recorded is.
California's Supreme Court decided one well-known case. A brokerage in Georgia, a one-party state, recorded calls with clients in California without telling them. The court held that California's all-party rule applied to those calls going forward (Kearney v. Salomon Smith Barney, 2006). Both the Reporters Committee and Kilpatrick Townsend give the same practical advice: when a call crosses state lines, follow the stricter state's rule. That's the safer practice for any business that takes calls from more than one state, which is most of them.
Call recording laws by state
The table shows the rule for recording phone calls in each state and DC, with the main statute. “Mixed” means the answer depends on the type of conversation, or the state's laws or courts point in different directions. Classifications come from the Kilpatrick Townsend wiretap chart and the RCFP state-by-state recording guide, checked October 29, 2026. Where they disagree, we say so. Always read the current statute for your state.
| State | Phone calls | Main statute | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | One-party | Ala. Code §§ 13A-11-30, 13A-11-31 | |
| Alaska | One-party | Alaska Stat. § 42.20.310 | The state supreme court held a participant may record (Palmer v. Alaska, 1979). (RCFP) |
| Arizona | One-party | Ariz. Rev. Stat. §§ 13-3005, 13-3012(9) | |
| Arkansas | One-party | Ark. Code § 5-60-120 | |
| California | All-party | Cal. Penal Code § 632 | Covers confidential calls. California has applied its law to out-of-state businesses calling California residents. |
| Colorado | One-party | Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-9-303 | |
| Connecticut | Mixed | Conn. Gen. Stat. §§ 53a-187 to 53a-189, 52-570d | Criminal law is one-party, but § 52-570d makes recording a phone call without all parties' consent a civil wrong. A recorded warning at the start counts. (RCFP) |
| Delaware | Mixed | 11 Del. C. §§ 2402(c)(4), 1335(a)(4) | The wiretap law is one-party; the privacy law reads as all-party. Treat it as all-party. (RCFP) |
| District of Columbia | One-party | D.C. Code § 23-542(b)(3) | |
| Florida | All-party | Fla. Stat. § 934.03 | |
| Georgia | One-party | Ga. Code § 16-11-66(a) | |
| Hawaii | One-party | Haw. Rev. Stat. § 803-42 | All-party for recording devices in a private place (§ 711-1111). (RCFP) |
| Idaho | One-party | Idaho Code § 18-6702(2)(d) | |
| Illinois | All-party | 720 ILCS 5/14-2 | Applies to private conversations recorded in secret. |
| Indiana | One-party | Ind. Code § 35-31.5-2-176 | |
| Iowa | One-party | Iowa Code § 808B.2 | |
| Kansas | One-party | Kan. Stat. § 21-6101 | |
| Kentucky | One-party | Ky. Rev. Stat. §§ 526.010, 526.020 | |
| Louisiana | One-party | La. Rev. Stat. § 15:1303(C)(4) | |
| Maine | One-party | Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 15, § 710 | |
| Maryland | All-party | Md. Code, Cts. & Jud. Proc. § 10-402 | |
| Massachusetts | All-party | Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 272, § 99 | Bans secret recording, so clear notice matters. |
| Michigan | Mixed | Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.539c | The statute reads as all-party. A 1982 appeals court ruling (Sullivan v. Gray) let a participant record, but the state supreme court hasn't ruled. Some charts list it as one-party. Get consent. (RCFP) |
| Minnesota | One-party | Minn. Stat. § 626A.02 | |
| Mississippi | One-party | Miss. Code § 41-29-531(e) | |
| Missouri | One-party | Mo. Rev. Stat. § 542.402.2(3) | One-party for phone calls. The in-person rule is less settled. (RCFP) |
| Montana | All-party | Mont. Code § 45-8-213 | A warning that the call is being recorded is an exception. (RCFP) |
| Nebraska | One-party | Neb. Rev. Stat. § 86-290(2)(c) | |
| Nevada | All-party | Nev. Rev. Stat. § 200.620 | All-party for phone calls (one-party for in-person, § 200.650), per the state supreme court. (RCFP) |
| New Hampshire | All-party | N.H. Rev. Stat. § 570-A:2 | |
| New Jersey | One-party | N.J. Stat. § 2A:156A-4(d) | |
| New Mexico | One-party | N.M. Stat. § 30-12-1(C) | |
| New York | One-party | N.Y. Penal Law §§ 250.00, 250.05 | |
| North Carolina | One-party | N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-287 | |
| North Dakota | One-party | N.D. Cent. Code § 12.1-15-02 | |
| Ohio | One-party | Ohio Rev. Code § 2933.52(B)(4) | |
| Oklahoma | One-party | Okla. Stat. tit. 13, § 176.4 | |
| Oregon | Mixed | Or. Rev. Stat. § 165.540 | One-party for phone calls. For in-person conversations, everyone must be told. Some charts list Oregon as all-party. (RCFP) |
| Pennsylvania | All-party | 18 Pa. C.S. §§ 5703, 5704 | |
| Rhode Island | One-party | R.I. Gen. Laws § 11-35-21 | |
| South Carolina | One-party | S.C. Code § 17-30-30 | |
| South Dakota | One-party | S.D. Codified Laws § 23A-35A-20 | |
| Tennessee | One-party | Tenn. Code § 39-13-601 | |
| Texas | One-party | Tex. Penal Code § 16.02 | |
| Utah | One-party | Utah Code § 77-23a-4 | |
| Vermont | One-party | No state recording statute | Federal one-party law applies. The state supreme court limited secret police recording inside a home (State v. Geraw, 2002). (RCFP) |
| Virginia | One-party | Va. Code § 19.2-62 | |
| Washington | All-party | Rev. Code Wash. § 9.73.030 | A recorded announcement at the start counts as consent. |
| West Virginia | One-party | W. Va. Code § 62-1D-3 | |
| Wisconsin | One-party | Wis. Stat. § 968.31 | |
| Wyoming | One-party | Wyo. Stat. § 7-3-702 |
Many states also have separate rules for hidden cameras, in-person conversations and recordings made by someone who isn't on the call. This table is only about a business recording calls it takes part in.
Quick answers for the states people ask about most
- Is it legal to record business calls in California? Only with everyone's consent. California's law is strict, and businesses have been sued under it. Announce the recording at the start of every call.
- Florida? All-party. Same advice: announce it.
- Texas? One-party, so you can record calls you're on. If the caller is in an all-party state, the stricter rule may still apply.
- New York? One-party. The same cross-state caution applies.
- Pennsylvania, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts and Washington? All-party. Get consent.
What a business should actually do
You don't need to look up every caller's state. One habit covers you almost everywhere:
- Announce it at the start. Before the conversation starts, say something like “This call may be recorded for quality and training.” A caller who hears that and stays on the line is generally treated as agreeing. Some states spell this out: Washington's statute says a recorded announcement counts as consent, Connecticut's accepts a recorded warning, and Montana has an exception for calls where people were warned.
- Record the announcement too. If anyone ever asks, the recording itself proves you told them.
- Offer a way out. If a caller says they don't want to be recorded, stop recording or offer to call them back on an unrecorded line.
- Announce on outbound calls as well. The rule applies when you call customers, not just when they call you.
- Treat recordings as private data. Recordings can include addresses, health details or payment information. Limit who can hear them, and keep them only as long as you need them.
- Check your industry rules. Healthcare, legal, financial and debt-collection businesses have extra rules on top of these. Ask your lawyer or industry association.
How Voxlivo handles recording
Voxlivo is an AI receptionist that answers your business calls 24/7. On every call it introduces itself as a virtual assistant and says the call may be recorded, before it takes any details. So the announcement happens at the start of every call, whatever state the caller is in. You then get the recording and a written transcript of each call in your portal, which helps you settle “what did they actually ask for?” questions.
That doesn't replace advice from your own lawyer, especially in regulated fields. Law offices, for example, should check their state bar's rules on recording client calls; our page on AI receptionists for law firms covers how intake works. To see the full call flow, read how it works, or check pricing (plans start at $49 a month for 100 minutes).
The bottom line
Federal law and most states let you record calls you're on. About a dozen states require everyone's consent, and calls cross state lines all the time. Announcing “this call may be recorded” at the start of every call is the simplest way to stay on the right side of all of them.
Again, this article is general information, not legal advice. Recording laws change, and courts read them in different ways. Before you rely on any of this for your business, talk to a lawyer licensed in your state. Checked October 29, 2026.
More from the blog
Missed calls · texting
Missed call text back: what it is, when it helps, and what to use instead
Pricing · 2026
How much does an AI receptionist cost in 2026? Real prices compared
Answering options
AI receptionist vs answering service vs voicemail: which does a small business need?
Free tool: voicemail greeting generator for your shop's after-hours message.
Hear it before you decide.
Call the two-minute demo and play a customer, or tell us about your business. A person sets it up, and you can be live in about a day.